Agenda for 25 February 2026 Sully District Council of Citizens Associations Meeting
by Jeff Parnes
Stop! — Is your Organization/Association a member of the Sully District Council of Citizens Association?If Not, Why Not? The dues are only $10 a yearIn numbers there is strengthYour membership helps pay for our WebEx license and the maintenance of website
|
|
Has your community made plans to join us for 2026?

Copy and paste the letter below, followed by your name and address. Hit SEND.
The Honorable Members Virginia House of Delegates P.O. Box 406 Richmond, VA 23218 By Email Re: Vote No SB 756 Dear Members of the House of Delegates: I urge you to oppose SB 756, authorizing a casino in Fairfax County, because we have deep concerns about the claimed economic and fiscal benefits. Instead of supporting communities in need, SB 756 flip-flops on past casino expansion policy and urges an inconsistent approach that undermines public trust in fair governance. We ask you to carefully consider the following key concerns before making your decision about this Bill: • It Violates Virginia’s Long-standing Principle of Local Control Over Land Use. This request did not originate from local land use authorities, or, in its original form, even legislators representing the districts in which the proposed casino would be located. It is not part of the County’s comprehensive plan, nor have the parties behind the bill sought local engagement. By moving this legislation forward despite clear opposition from elected officials, this Bill overlooks local autonomy and the perspectives of those most directly affected. • It Represents a Blatant Disregard for Local Political Leadership. Fairfax County’s Board of Supervisors opposes casino legislation in its 2026 Legislative agenda. • It Totally Ignores the Wishes of the People of Fairfax County. Multiple polls have shown that the people of Fairfax County do not want a casino. Opposition is widespread (75% opposed, county-wide) and crosses political, economic, and racial divisions. Additionally, 66% of respondents associated with unions oppose a casino. • It is a Direct Assault on a Prosperous Economic Powerhouse. This Bill singles out one of Virginia’s most dynamic and thriving economic and residential centers and threatens to destabilize what works. Introducing casino gambling in Fairfax County jeopardizes a proven success story for speculative gains. • Dubious, Pie-in-the-Sky Promises. The financial claims behind this Bill are not just unverified – they’re downright fantastical. The Patron has claimed that a casino will bring substantial economic benefits to both Fairfax County and the state, but these claims remain unsubstantiated and lack independent, rigorous analysis. The outrageous claims about reducing Fairfax County real estate taxes by 10% would require annual casino revenues of approximately $4.5 billion – a figure that exceeds the performance of established venues like Maryland’s MGM National Harbor and major Las Vegas casinos by at least a factor of 3! • It Represents a Radical Departure from Virginia’s Casino Establishment Policies. The Bill would shred established precedent authorizing casino expansion into localities most in need of economic revitalization. Instead, the Patron’s Bill targets a flourishing area that generated 20% of the State’s General Fund Revenue, according to a recent report by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service at the University of Virginia. Although the location parameters have been changed slightly from the Bill’s initial version, it is clear that the target for this casino remains the Tysons corridor. Placing a casino in Fairfax County’s Tysons corridor could divert consumer spending from existing businesses, weaken the county’s strong tax base, and threaten essential public services. This legislation threatens to destabilize a major contributor to Virginia’s economy, disregards the will of the people and their local elected officials, and relies on demonstrably false financial assumptions and claims. Rather than comprehensive, impartial economic studies, the Proponents of this measure ask the General Assembly to rely on their oral representations of unverified forecasts, and in doing so, are exposing Fairfax County and the Commonwealth to significant fiscal risks. We trust in your commitment to responsible governance and the long-term prosperity of our Commonwealth. We respectfully and urgently ask that you safeguard the fiscal health of your constituents by voting ‘No’ when SB 756 comes before you. Sincerely, Your Name Your address, city, state zipGratefully, sLynne Mulston, Chair

In fall 2021, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors set a goal to identify and invest $100 million by 2027 to improve and expand active transportation infrastructure throughout the county. Last fall, the board approved an additional $25.43 million in one-time investment bringing the total amount contributed since 2021 to $82.12 million. These funds are intended to enhance safety, accessibility and connectivity for people walking, biking and using other forms of non-motorized transportation.
Members of the public are encouraged to review the preliminary list of potential projects for their districts and share feedback by participating in an online survey. District project lists, maps and surveys may be accessed on the Active Transportation Prioritization webpage. Survey submissions are due by 4:30 p.m., on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.
Additionally, FCDOT will host two virtual community meetings to review the methodology and criteria used to select eligible projects and to gather input from residents on local priorities. Meeting dates, times and joining instructions are listed below and meeting recordings will be posted on the Active Transportation Prioritization webpage within 24 hours of each meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey M. Parnes